# Description of Changes
This reverts the version bump, since it seems to be causing test
flakiness somehow.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [ ] CI passes
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
Version upgrade to `v1.12.0`.
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1 - this is just a version upgrade
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
The testsuite failures are fixed by
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/pull/4120
- [x] License has been properly updated including version number and
date
- [x] CI passes
---------
Co-authored-by: rekhoff <r.ekhoff@clockworklabs.io>
Co-authored-by: clockwork-labs-bot <clockwork-labs-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
- Version upgrade to `1.11.2`
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
- None, this is just a version bump
# Expected complexity level and risk
1 - no real changes here
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
- NA this is just a version bump, no functionality change here.
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
- Bump version numbers to `1.11.1`
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
- [x] Verified that the license has been updated
- [x] `spacetime --version` on this commit is correct
There is also a corresponding private PR.
# Description of Changes
Bumping versions to 1.11.0 in preparation for an upcoming release.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [x] Existing CI passes
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
This upgrades the SpacetimeDB version to 1.10.0.
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
This is just a version bump - not tested.
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
Upgrade to version 1.9.0.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None - just a version upgrade.
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [x] I verified that the license has been updated
- [x] The version number looks correct (1.9.0)
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <196249+bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
- This upgrades the versions of all SDKs, the CLI, etc. to 1.8.0
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
1
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [x] I verified that all versions seem to be updated including the BSL
license update <!-- maybe a test you want to do -->
We have 1 `1.7.0` that didn't get upgraded automatically because it is
part of the module bindings for a template:
```
crates/cli/.templates/parent_parent_crates_bindings-typescript_examples_quickstart-chat/src/module_bindings/index.ts: cliVersion: '1.7.0',
```
A case could possibly be made for bumping the template but it shouldn't
cause any issues as the module bindings directory should just get
regenerated by the user. @cloutiertyler should we be bumping module
bindings for templates when we upgrade versions?
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <196249+bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Bump versions to 1.7.0 in preparation for the release.
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [x] CI passes
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Bumping versions to 1.6.0 in preparation for upcoming release.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [x] Existing CI only
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Bumping remaining files so that everything is at 1.4.0.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
None
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Bumped all versions to 1.3.0 in preparation for an upcoming minor
release.
# API and ABI breaking changes
No breaking changes.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
None
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
I ran `python3 tools~/upgrade-version.py 1.2.2` in preparation for an
upcoming release.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
None, just a version bump.
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description of Changes
Bump versions to 1.2.0, as well as update the DLLs from SpacetimeDB
(commit `fc8f7dcc8`). They don't have any changes, but the versions
needed bumping.
## API
This itself is not a breaking changes.
## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/pull/2837
## Testsuite
SpacetimeDB branch name: release/v1.2.0
## Testing
CI only
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description of Changes
Just bumping version numbers in preparation for a release.
The Unity SDK and C# SDK had different version numbers. That seems
confusing, so I bumped them both to 1.1.5.
## API
No breaking changes
## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
None, afaik
## Testsuite
SpacetimeDB branch name: master
## Testing
None
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description of Changes
*Describe what has been changed, any new features or bug fixes*
- Bumps version to 1.1.4
## API
Not breaking
- [ ] This is an API breaking change to the SDK
*If the API is breaking, please state below what will break*
## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
*List any PRs here that are required for this SDK change to work*
## Testsuite
*If you would like to run the your SDK changes in this PR against a
specific SpacetimeDB branch, specify that here. This can be a branch
name or a link to a PR.*
SpacetimeDB branch name: master
## Testing
*Write instructions for a test that you performed for this PR*
This is just a version bump
## Description of Changes
*Describe what has been changed, any new features or bug fixes*
- Bumps version to 1.1.3
## API
This is not an API breaking change
- [ ] This is an API breaking change to the SDK
*If the API is breaking, please state below what will break*
## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
*List any PRs here that are required for this SDK change to work*
- None
## Testsuite
*If you would like to run the your SDK changes in this PR against a
specific SpacetimeDB branch, specify that here. This can be a branch
name or a link to a PR.*
SpacetimeDB branch name: master
## Testing
*Write instructions for a test that you performed for this PR*
This is just a version bump, CI is sufficient.
## Description of Changes
Bumping the version since 1.1.1 has been released.
## API
No breaking changes
## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
None
## Testsuite
SpacetimeDB branch name: master
## Testing
None, just a version bump.
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description of Changes
Just bumping version numbers in preparation for an upcoming release.
I also relaxed the version constraints in the `.csproj` files to be
flexible in their patch versions.
## API
- [ ] This is an API breaking change to the SDK
No breaking changes.
## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
None
## Testsuite
SpacetimeDB branch name: master
## Testing
Just existing CI, since this just bumps version numbers.
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description of Changes
Bump yet another version number.
## API
- [ ] This is an API breaking change to the SDK
*If the API is breaking, please state below what will break*
## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
*List any PRs here that are required for this SDK change to work*
## Testsuite
*If you would like to run the your SDK changes in this PR against a
specific SpacetimeDB branch, specify that here. This can be a branch
name or a link to a PR.*
SpacetimeDB branch name: master
## Testing
None
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Updates package version to 1.0.1
## API
- [ ] This is an API breaking change to the SDK
## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
No specific PR needed
## Testsuite
SpacetimeDB branch name: release/v1.0.1
## Testing
- [X] Confirmed Unity sees version as 1.0.1 after change
# Description of Changes
Update the C# server and client SDK quickstart-chat example to match the
code presented in the tutorial, as of
https://github.com/clockworklabs/spacetime-docs/pull/170 .
Also renamed the directory from `quickstart` to `quickstart-chat` in
order to be more specific.
# API and ABI breaking changes
If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
SpacetimeDB branch name: master
com.clockworklabs.spacetimedbsdk: master
# Testing
*Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected!*
- [x] Ran `quickstart-chat` C# server and C# client locally and:
- Set my name.
- Sent a message.
- Restarted and viewed the message backlog.
- Sent a few more messages.
- Exited, deleted my local token, restarted and connected as a new
identity.
- Set my new identity's name.
- Sent a message as my new identity.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: John Detter <no-reply@boppygames.gg>
Co-authored-by: james gilles <jameshgilles@gmail.com>
## Description of Changes
Bump package version to `1.0.0-rc3` and do a preliminary upgrade of the
DLLs.
I believe the DLLs might need updating again once the BSATN.Runtime
package is pushed to NuGet (because then it will be fetched from NuGet).
## API
Not API breaking.
## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/pull/2094
## Testsuite
SpacetimeDB branch name: release/v1.0.0-rc3
## Testing
- [x] Existing CI is successful (pointed at the RC3 SpacetimeDB branch).
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description of Changes
Just bump `package.json` to `1.0.0-rc1` instead of `1.0.0`.
## API
No breaking changes
## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
None
## Testing
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description of Changes
Update the SpacetimeDB C# DLLs to be up to date with `master` in
SpacetimeDB (now that C# bindings have been bumped to `v1.0.0-rc1`).
We will need a followup PR
## API
Not a breaking change.
## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
`master`
## Testing
Only automated tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description of Changes
*Describe what has been changed, any new features or bug fixes*
- Upgrade version to 0.12.
## API
- [ ] This is an API breaking change to the SDK
*If the API is breaking, please state below what will break*
## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
*List any PRs here that are required for this SDK change to work*
Co-authored-by: John Detter <no-reply@boppygames.gg>
## Description of Changes
This creates a frankenstein monster of a repo that is compatible with
both .NET / MSBuild as well as can be consumed as a Unity package.
- `.meta` files, Unity manifests and Unity README were copied over from
the Unity repo.
- `examples` and `tests` folders were renamed to `examples~` and
`tests~` correspondingly, as the `~` suffix is the only way to get
entire folders ignored by Unity.
- MSBuild was configured to change `bin` and `obj` to `bin~` and `obj~`
for the same reasons. This doesn't matter for the Git repo, but helpful
for local development where you don't want Unity to try and load local
DLL artifacts.
- NuGet was configured to restore Unity-compatible NuGet DLLs (and
delete others) in a local folder and committed to the repo - so, from
now on, we can easily update them by modifying `.csproj` and via
standard `dotnet restore` / `dotnet build`.
After this change, this repo should be compatible with both .NET CLI
(e.g. `dotnet test`) as well as consumable from Unity, but due to amount
of metadata changes, it needs further testing before we merge repos
properly.
Fixes#114.
## API
- [ ] This is an API breaking change to the SDK
*If the API is breaking, please state below what will break*
## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
*List any PRs here that are required for this SDK change to work*
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Zeke Foppa