# Description of Changes
Bump versions to 2.1.0
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
CI
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Adds `tools/templates/` scripts to derive template metadata from
manifests and generate READMEs from quickstart docs. Replaces slug-based
`builtWith` with manifest-derived data and hardcoded quickstart mappings
with discovery from docs.
**Manifest-based `builtWith`** (`update-template-jsons.ts`)
- Reads `package.json`, `Cargo.toml`, and `.csproj` to populate
`builtWith` in `.template.json`.
- Scoped npm packages normalize to scope (`@angular/core` → `angular`).
Excludes `@types/*`. Adds `nodejs` only for nodejs-ts when `@types/node`
is present.
- Root manifests processed before subdirs; primary framework first (e.g.
`react` before `spacetimedb` in react-ts). Dependencies reordered in
package.json where needed.
**Dynamic quickstart discovery** (`generate-template-readmes.ts`)
- Discovers template → quickstart by parsing `--template X` from files
in `docs/docs/00100-intro/00200-quickstarts/`.
- Optional `quickstart` override in `.template.json`; must resolve under
quickstarts dir.
- chat-react-ts has no quickstart; uses manual README.
**New:** `tools/templates/` (update-template-jsons.ts,
generate-template-readmes.ts, README, package.json, pnpm-lock).
**Modified:** all `templates/*/.template.json` (added `builtWith`),
new/generated `templates/*/README.md`.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None.
# Expected complexity level and risk
**1** – Dev tooling only. No runtime or API changes. Scripts are
isolated; failures only affect generated metadata and READMEs.
# Testing
- [ ] `cd tools/templates && pnpm run generate` completes without errors
- [ ] Spot-check `builtWith` and generated READMEs for a few templates
# Description of Changes
Make the `global.json` files under `templates` into literal copies of
the root one, instead of symlinks. The symlinks were causing template
breakage when the CLI was built under windows.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [x] Changing a template's global.json causes `cargo ci
global-json-policy` to fail
- [x] Making a template's global.json into a symlink also causes `cargo
ci global-json-policy` to fail
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Basic tests for templates, the test tries to generate each of the
template, build and publish the SpacetimeDB part, and build or type
check the client side.
This PR also includes bindings for all of the clients as it's needed for
the tests to work and given the choices to either generate during the
test run or include the bindings in git we chose the latter. This makes
it consistent across the templates as some of them already included
bindings.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
---------
Co-authored-by: clockwork-labs-bot <clockwork-labs-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: rekhoff <r.ekhoff@clockworklabs.io>
# Description of Changes
Implementation of #4295
Convert existing `Name` attribute to `Accessor` to support new Canonical
Case conversation of 2.0
# API and ABI breaking changes
Yes, in C# modules, we no longer use the attribute name `Name`, it
should now be `Accessor`
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [X] Build and tested locally
- [X] Ran regression tests locally
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
- Version upgrade to 2.0.
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
# Expected complexity level and risk
1 - this is just a version bump
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [x] License file has been updated
- [x] CI passing
---------
Signed-off-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Modules are like programs, databases are like processes. Your client
connects to a remote database, not a remote module.
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
# API and ABI breaking changes
Yep!
# Expected complexity level and risk
2? I made this change with find + replace, and it's possible that I
borked the edit, or missed some reference somehow. It seems unlikely,
however, that this change will have deeper implications we haven't
considered.
# Testing
N/a
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
Copied from: https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/pull/4084
We originally reverted this because it was causing testsuite flakes in
private. Now we have solved the issue that was causing the flakes so
this should be safe to merge.
Version upgrade to `v1.12.0`.
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1 - this is just a version upgrade
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
The testsuite failures are fixed by
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/pull/4120
- [x] License has been properly updated including version number and
date
- [x] CI passes
---------
Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: rekhoff <r.ekhoff@clockworklabs.io>
Co-authored-by: clockwork-labs-bot <clockwork-labs-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
We have had several `global.json` files introduced that aren't symlinks
to the root `global.json`.
This PR fixes that drift, and adds a CI check.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None.
# Expected complexity level and risk
2
# Testing
- [x] `cargo ci global-json-policy` succeeds
- [x] `cargo ci global-json-policy` fails if you add a new `global.json`
file somewhere
- [x] Rest of CI passes, confirming that templates are still working
properly
---------
Signed-off-by: Zeke Foppa <196249+bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
This reverts the version bump, since it seems to be causing test
flakiness somehow.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [ ] CI passes
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
Version upgrade to `v1.12.0`.
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1 - this is just a version upgrade
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
The testsuite failures are fixed by
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/pull/4120
- [x] License has been properly updated including version number and
date
- [x] CI passes
---------
Co-authored-by: rekhoff <r.ekhoff@clockworklabs.io>
Co-authored-by: clockwork-labs-bot <clockwork-labs-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
This PR renames the templates to always use shorthand for the language,
specify a framework (or console) if necessary, and shorten the naming in
general
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
I've tested generating templates manually
---------
Co-authored-by: clockwork-labs-bot <clockwork-labs-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
clockwork-labs-bot