# Description of Changes
Our automated discord posts have a more explicit call to action for the
PR author.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
Did a test post and it looks fine
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
I thought this was covered by the `NEUTRAL` case, but apparently
`SKIPPED` is separate.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
We'll see when it merges 🤷
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
When the author isn't in the lookup table, we were getting `null`
instead of the empty string. This fixes that.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None. CI only.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
None
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Filter out the discord notification job itself, as well as any neutral
results.
# API and ABI breaking changes
CI only.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
Unsure how to test this without merging the PR
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
The previews only work for public repos, meaning that the posts end up
looking inconsistent. I don't believe the previews add much information
anyway. _If_ there's information in there that we want, we should add it
to the post itself.
# API and ABI breaking changes
No.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
None. We'll see when it merges!
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
We had places that weren't passing `-y`. I assume these were only
working because they were in environments where the things were already
installed, so there wasn't any confirmation dialog. For some reason, the
arm runner now newly needs to install packages, so CI invocations began
failing.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None. CI only.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [x] CI passes
- [ ] the "Test spacetimedb-update" flow passes on arm, which is not
currently true elsewhere.
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>