# Description of Changes
Bumping versions to 1.11.0 in preparation for an upcoming release.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [x] Existing CI passes
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
This upgrades the SpacetimeDB version to 1.10.0.
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
This is just a version bump - not tested.
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
Upgrade to version 1.9.0.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None - just a version upgrade.
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [x] I verified that the license has been updated
- [x] The version number looks correct (1.9.0)
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <196249+bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
- This upgrades the versions of all SDKs, the CLI, etc. to 1.8.0
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
1
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [x] I verified that all versions seem to be updated including the BSL
license update <!-- maybe a test you want to do -->
We have 1 `1.7.0` that didn't get upgraded automatically because it is
part of the module bindings for a template:
```
crates/cli/.templates/parent_parent_crates_bindings-typescript_examples_quickstart-chat/src/module_bindings/index.ts: cliVersion: '1.7.0',
```
A case could possibly be made for bumping the template but it shouldn't
cause any issues as the module bindings directory should just get
regenerated by the user. @cloutiertyler should we be bumping module
bindings for templates when we upgrade versions?
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <196249+bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Bump versions to 1.7.0 in preparation for the release.
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [x] CI passes
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
This is a draft of the new functionality for `spacetime init`. In order
to run it with built-in templates you have to set the path to the config
file:
```
export SPACETIMEDB_CLI_TEMPLATES_FILE=crates/cli/.init-templates.json
```
In the future it will fetch the list from GH.
A few notes:
* the previous functionality of `spacetime init` does not work at the
moment
* the code needs a bit more cleanup and tests before merging
* there is a bit of a mix in how we generate empty server and client
projects. For Rust we use the existing way of generating. For TypeScript
we clone an empty project from the repo. I wanted to play with both ways
of doing things, and I'm still not sure which is better. Generation in
Rust means that the generated code will match the CLI version and not
necessarily whatever is in Git. On the other hand, for the builtin
templates we will be fetching the newest version from GH, which I guess
might also not what we want, ie. we probably want only stable templates.
More discussion is needed here
* we use `spacetimedb` directory for the server files
* I don't particularly like the inability to disable interactive mode
easily. We discussed disabling it by default if all of the required
arguments are passed, but I don't think it's feature proof. For example,
if someone relies on a non-interactive mode, and we add a new required
argument, instead of printing a message `missing --foo`, we will
automatically launch interactive mode, which is harder to debug. That's
why I think I'd prefer to implement `--non-interactive` argument
* it's kind of hard to keep the legacy behaviour. If you don't pass any
arguments, we go into interactive mode. In the legacy version, we would
print required arguments. If someone passes `--lang` or `--project-path`
explicitly, I guess we could run the legacy workflow, but not sure if
it's worth it, as the command was marked as unstable anyway
* the project path defaults to the project name, but I think we should
probably replace change whitespaces to dashes, or at least ask for the
project path with the project name being the default (or both)
---------
Signed-off-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: = <cloutiertyler@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@aol.com>
Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
Zeke Foppa