# Description of Changes
Removes the `TimestampCapabilities` test from the C# SDK's regression
test suite, due to creating inconsistent failures in automated CI
testing.
# API and ABI breaking changes
Not API/ABI breaking
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [X] Ran locally, no failures in building or running C# regression
tests
# Description of Changes
Implements the C# equivalent of #3638
This implement uses inheritance, where abstract base classes (like
`ProcedureContextBase` in `ProcedureContext.cs`) store the core of the
implementation, and then generated wrappers (like `ProcedureContext` in
the generated FFI.cs file) inherit from them.
For error handling, we work like Rust's implementation of `Result<T,E>`
but we require `where E : Exception` because of how exceptions work in
C#. Transaction-level failures come back as a `TxOutcome` and user
errors should follow the `Result<T,E>` pattern. In this implementation,
we have `UnwrapOrThrow()` throws exceptions directly because of C#'s
error handling pattern.
Unlike the Rust implementation's direct `Result` propagation, we are
using an `AbortGuard` pattern (in `ProcedureContext.cs`) for exception
handling, which uses `IDisposable` for automatic cleanup.
Most changes should have fairly similar Rust-equivalents beyond that.
For module authors, the changes here allow for the transation logic to
work like:
```csharp
ctx.TryWithTx<ResultType, Exception>(tx => {
// transaction logic
return Result<ResultType, Exception>.Ok(result);
});
```
This change includes a number of tests added to the
`sdks/csharp/examples~/regression-tests/`'s `server` and `client` to
validate the behavior of the changes. `server` changes provide further
usage examples for module authors.
# API and ABI breaking changes
Should not be a breaking change
# Expected complexity level and risk
2
# Testing
- [x] Created Regression Tests that show transitions in procedures
working in various ways, all of which pass.
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
- Bump version numbers to `1.11.1`
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
- [x] Verified that the license has been updated
- [x] `spacetime --version` on this commit is correct
There is also a corresponding private PR.
# Description of Changes
This reapplies the patch from #3704, and fixes the issues that were
causing it to deadlock.
The reason it was deadlocking was that it allowed for the following
sequence of events:
* `SchedulerActor::handle_queued()` begins mutable tx
* `ModuleHost::disconnect_client()` submits call to `call_reducer(tx:
None)`
* scheduler submits call to `call_reducer(tx: Some)`
* `WasmModuleInstance::disconnect_client` now has to try to take tx
lock, but the scheduler's call_reducer already holds it and is behind it
in the queue
So, I moved most of the logic from `handle_queued` back to being
executed in the module worker thread, but kept the code in
`scheduler.rs` so that it can all be reasoned about locally.
Fixes#3645. Should I uncomment the implementation of
`ExportFunctionForScheduledTable for F: Procedure` now?
# Expected complexity level and risk
2 - there's a chance that this patch hasn't fully fixed the deadlock
issue from #3704, but I'm quite confident.
# Testing
- [x] Manually verified that deadlock no longer occurs - previously,
`while true; do python -m smoketests schedule_reducer -k
test_scheduled_table_subscription; done` would freeze up in only 2 or 3
iterations, but now it can run for 10 minutes without issues.
# Description of Changes
Bumping versions to 1.11.0 in preparation for an upcoming release.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [x] Existing CI passes
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
This upgrades the SpacetimeDB version to 1.10.0.
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
This is just a version bump - not tested.
This reverts commit b2e37e8008.
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
Reverts #3704 which I'm pretty sure contains some sort of bug which is
causing the smoketests to hang.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [x] CI passing again
# Description of Changes
Reworks how `SchedulerActor::handle_queued` works so that it first
determines the parameters of the call to a reducer or the parameters of
the call to the procedure. This also enables the removal of the special
case `call_scheduled_reducer`.
Fixes#3645.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
2
# Testing
A test `schedule_procedure` is added.
---------
Co-authored-by: Noa <coolreader18@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Phoebe Goldman <phoebe@goldman-tribe.org>
Co-authored-by: rekhoff <r.ekhoff@clockworklabs.io>
# Description of Changes
Implements the C# module bindings for Procedures (#3510)
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
2
# Testing
- [X] Locally tested against existing C# Procedures regression test
client (minus the Transaction and HTTP portions, as those are not in
this change).
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
Upgrade to version 1.9.0.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None - just a version upgrade.
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [x] I verified that the license has been updated
- [x] The version number looks correct (1.9.0)
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <196249+bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Closes: #3533
Updated the C# SDK to handle procedures and procedure callbacks in a
similar fashion to the Rust client as well as added the codegen to
support it.
# API and ABI breaking changes
N/A
# Expected complexity level and risk
2 - This adds a new testing frame that should be removed once procedures
are handled with C# module bindings
# Testing
Added /sdks/csharp/examples~/regression-tests/procedure-client to match
modules/sdk-test-procedure which we can roll into the standard
regression-tests once C# supports the procedure attribute.
- [x] Add C# client test of sdk-test-procedure
---------
Signed-off-by: Jason Larabie <jason@clockworklabs.io>
# Description of Changes
1. Updates the Replication Tests in
`sdks/csharp/examples~/regression-tests` to include better coverage of
Views
2. Added missing linkage for __call_view__ and __call_view_anon__
3. Updated *ViewDispatcher Invoke to transform BSATN.ValueOption<> into
BSATN.List<>
4. Fixed issues with the indexing of views to match correctly during
__call_view__ and __call_view_anon__
# API and ABI breaking changes
No
# Expected complexity level and risk
2
# Testing
- [x] Running `run-regression-tests.sh` passes.
---------
Signed-off-by: rekhoff <r.ekhoff@clockworklabs.io>
Signed-off-by: Jason Larabie <jason@clockworklabs.io>
Co-authored-by: Jason Larabie <jason@clockworklabs.io>
Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: joshua-spacetime <josh@clockworklabs.io>
# Description of Changes
Closes: #3658
With the work on Views we ran into trouble with the Return Type and
certain C# code layout where the types are defined inside the Module
class. This fixes the bug in our current approach but needs
consideration to possibly be changed entirely.
# API and ABI breaking changes
N/A
# Expected complexity level and risk
1 - Minor change
# Testing
- [x] Retested with the linked code with and without the namespace
- [x] Re-ran regression tests
---------
Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: joshua-spacetime <josh@clockworklabs.io>
Co-authored-by: rekhoff <r.ekhoff@clockworklabs.io>
# Description of Changes
Fixes client codegen for views.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
2
# Testing
I'm not sure what tests we have for C++.
- [x] Updated client snapshots for rust, C#, and typescript
- [ ] Rust sdk test
---------
Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jason Larabie <jason@clockworklabs.io>
# Description of Changes
This PR is a very large change to the workings of the TypeScript SDK and
as such requires a higher bar of testing than other PRs. However, it
does several important things:
1. Unifies the API of the server and client so they not only have the
same API, but they actually implement it with the same TypeScript types.
This fixes several inconsistencies between them and fixes several small
bugs as well.
2. Closes https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/issues/3365
3. Closes https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/issues/3431
4. Closes https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/issues/3435
5. Subsumes the work done in
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/pull/3447
6. Derives all type information on the client from a single
`RemoteModule` type which vastly cleans up the correctness of type
checking on the client and helped me to find several small bugs
It accomplishes this by changing code generation of TypeScript on the
client to code generation approximately what a developer would manually
write in their module. The ultimate goal would be to allow the developer
to use the types and functions that they define on in their module
directly on the client without needing to do any code generation at all,
provided they are using TypeScript on the server and client.
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/issues/3365 is resolved by
`.build()`ing the `DbConnection` inside a React `useEffect` rather than
doing it directly in line with the render of the provider. In order to
do that we needed to not expose the `DbConnection` directly to
developers by returning a different type from `useSpacetimeDB`.
`useSpacetimeDB` now returns a `ConnectionState` object which is stored
as React state and updates when any of the fields change. This change
also resolves https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/issues/3431.
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/issues/3435 was the issue
that initially lead me down the rabbit hole of unifying the server and
the client because it was nearly impossible to track down all the
various type functions and how they connect to the values that we code
generate on the server. After several hours of attempting this, I
decided to clean up the types a bit to be more uniform.
Implementing the unification between the client and the server also
necessitated fully implemented parts of the API that were fully
implemented on the server, but were broken or missing on the client.
# API and ABI breaking changes
[Unification] -> Means that this is breaking behavior for the client
SDK, but that the new behavior is identical to the server's existing
behavior
## Breaking changes:
- Table accessor names and index accessor names are converted to
camelCase on the `ctx`, so `ctx.db.foo_bar` is now `ctx.db.fooBar`
- [Unification] On the client `my_table.iter()` returns
`IterableIterator` instead of an `Array`
- [Unification] `module_bindings` now export `TypeBuilder`s for all
types instead of a `type MyType` and object `MyType`, so instead of
using `MyType` as a type directly, you need to infer the type `MyType`
-> `Infer<typeof MyType>`.
- [Unification] We no longer generate and export `MyTypeVariants` for
sum types (these are now accessed by `Infer<typeof
MyType.variants.myVariant>`)
- [Unification] `MyType.getTypeScriptAlgebraicType()` has been replaced
with `MyType.algebraicType`
- `useSpacetimeDB()` no longer takes type parameters
- `useTable()` now takes a `TableDef` parameter and type params are
inferred
- `useTable()` now just returns an `Array` directly instead of a object
with `{ rows }`
- [Unification] `ctx.reducers.createPlayer(argA, argB)` ->
`ctx.reducers.createPlayer({ argA, argB })`
- [Unification] `ctx.reducers.onCreatePlayer(ctx, argA, argB)` ->
`ctx.reducers.onCreatePlayer(ctx, { argA, argB })`
- [Unification] `ctx.reducers.removeOnCreatePlayer(ctx, argA, argB)` ->
`ctx.reducers.removeOnCreatePlayer(ctx, { argA, argB })`
- [Unification] `myTable.count(): number` -> `myTable.count(): bigint`
## Additive changes:
- `Infer<>` now also does `InferTypeOfRow<>` if applicable
- Added a `useReducer()` React hook
- `module_bindings` now exports a `tables` object with references to all
the `TableDef`s
- `module_bindings` now exports a `reducers` object with references to
all the `ReducerDef`s
- Added a new `MyType.create('MyVariant', ...)` function in addition to
the `MyType.MyVariant(...)` constructors (this is private)
## Notable things that did not change:
- `MyType.serialize(writer: BinaryWriter, value: Infer<typeof MyType>)`
and `MyType.deserialize(reader: BinaryReader): Infer<typeof MyType>` are
still supported exactly as before.
- The `MyType.MyVariant(...)` constructor function on sum types is still
present, but implemented with the private `MyType.create('MyVariant',
...)`. We could choose to move away from this API later if we didn't
like the variants polluting the namespace
# Expected complexity level and risk
4 - This is a deep reaching an complex change for the SDK. For the
server, it is much less deep reaching since it reuses much of the same
machinery, although it does require thorough testing there as some of
the code was modified.
This change is fully localized to TypeScript and does not touch the host
(or other languages) at all, and therefore only impacts a beta aspect of
SpacetimeDB.
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [ ] Added regression test for
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/issues/3435
- [x] Manually tested `test-app` and `test-react-router-app`
- [ ] Add test cases for camelCase-ing
---------
Signed-off-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Noa <coolreader18@gmail.com>
Allows the SpacetimeDBClient to be configured with or without confirmed
reads. Like for [TypeScript], the parameter is optional -- the server
chooses the default if not set explicitly.
[TypeScript]: https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/pull/3247
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
I don't actually know what I'm doing 😅
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
- This upgrades the versions of all SDKs, the CLI, etc. to 1.8.0
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
1
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [x] I verified that all versions seem to be updated including the BSL
license update <!-- maybe a test you want to do -->
We have 1 `1.7.0` that didn't get upgraded automatically because it is
part of the module bindings for a template:
```
crates/cli/.templates/parent_parent_crates_bindings-typescript_examples_quickstart-chat/src/module_bindings/index.ts: cliVersion: '1.7.0',
```
A case could possibly be made for bumping the template but it shouldn't
cause any issues as the module bindings directory should just get
regenerated by the user. @cloutiertyler should we be bumping module
bindings for templates when we upgrade versions?
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <196249+bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Updates C# bindings to allow module authors to define `View`s and
`AnonymousView`s using the pattern:
```
[SpacetimeDB.View]
public static ExampleData? GetExampleDataById(ViewContext ctx, uint id)
{
return ctx.Db.ExampleData.Id.Find(id);
}
[SpacetimeDB.View]
public static ExampleData? GetAnonymousExampleDataById(AnonymousViewContext ctx, uint id)
{
return ctx.Db.ExampleData.Id.Find(id);
}
```
During publishing of a C# module, the views data will be converted into
`RawViewDefV9`
# API and ABI breaking changes
No known breaking changes
# Expected complexity level and risk
2
# Testing
- [X] Locally tested locally adding the above sample pattern to the
`sdks\csharp\examples~\regression-tests\server` test and performing a
`dotnet build` and a `spacetime publish test`, both of which succeeded.
---------
Signed-off-by: Jason Larabie <jason@clockworklabs.io>
Co-authored-by: Jason Larabie <jason@clockworklabs.io>
# Description of Changes
Following #3498 , run the `gen-client-api.sh` tool to fix one of the
non-required CI checks.
# API and ABI breaking changes
N/a
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
Automated testing is fine.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Bump versions to 1.7.0 in preparation for the release.
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [x] CI passes
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
This PR implements a new command for the CLI: `spacetime dev`. If run
from outside of a project directory, it will call `init` in interactive
mode to allow user to create a project. If run from a project directory,
it will ask for a module to conect to and it will:
* subscribe to logs
* observe files in the `spacetimedb` directory and automatically publish
to SpacetimeDB
One caveat is that instead of reusing the `logs` code I did some
repetition cause currently the logs code acquires a lock that lives
through await points. It is fixable, but due to limited time I decided
to go with a bit of code duplication. It shouldn't be very hard to fix
later, though.
---------
Signed-off-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: = <cloutiertyler@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@aol.com>
Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
This is a draft of the new functionality for `spacetime init`. In order
to run it with built-in templates you have to set the path to the config
file:
```
export SPACETIMEDB_CLI_TEMPLATES_FILE=crates/cli/.init-templates.json
```
In the future it will fetch the list from GH.
A few notes:
* the previous functionality of `spacetime init` does not work at the
moment
* the code needs a bit more cleanup and tests before merging
* there is a bit of a mix in how we generate empty server and client
projects. For Rust we use the existing way of generating. For TypeScript
we clone an empty project from the repo. I wanted to play with both ways
of doing things, and I'm still not sure which is better. Generation in
Rust means that the generated code will match the CLI version and not
necessarily whatever is in Git. On the other hand, for the builtin
templates we will be fetching the newest version from GH, which I guess
might also not what we want, ie. we probably want only stable templates.
More discussion is needed here
* we use `spacetimedb` directory for the server files
* I don't particularly like the inability to disable interactive mode
easily. We discussed disabling it by default if all of the required
arguments are passed, but I don't think it's feature proof. For example,
if someone relies on a non-interactive mode, and we add a new required
argument, instead of printing a message `missing --foo`, we will
automatically launch interactive mode, which is harder to debug. That's
why I think I'd prefer to implement `--non-interactive` argument
* it's kind of hard to keep the legacy behaviour. If you don't pass any
arguments, we go into interactive mode. In the legacy version, we would
print required arguments. If someone passes `--lang` or `--project-path`
explicitly, I guess we could run the legacy workflow, but not sure if
it's worth it, as the command was marked as unstable anyway
* the project path defaults to the project name, but I think we should
probably replace change whitespaces to dashes, or at least ask for the
project path with the project name being the default (or both)
---------
Signed-off-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: = <cloutiertyler@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@aol.com>
Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
This implements a fix to an issue with debugging using the C# SDK, by
adding new exception types:
* `SpacetimeDBException`,
* `SpacetimeDBArgumentException`,
* `SpacetimeDBEmptyReducerNameException`
Additional, regenerating bindings will now allow clients to report an
`SpacetimeDBEmptyReducerNameException` rather than an
`ArgumentOutOfRangeException` when the client receives an empty reducer
name from the server.
An example of the generated code currently, that results in the
exception:
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/blob/544e2edc2d1f7d1dd118832a815b6dbd7a6c1d82/sdks/csharp/examples~/quickstart-chat/client/module_bindings/SpacetimeDBClient.g.cs#L475
Note: Normally this is not an issue for a client, because the
`SpacetimeDBEmptyReducerNameException` would be caught by the
[Try/Catch](https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/blob/9f59118e24449cdd2d3e182bd44fdb26078e921b/sdks/csharp/src/SpacetimeDBClient.cs#L421C25-L421C42)
statement, but a debugger will still catch the exception and halt
operation. This can be annoying to a developer when debugging.
By separating out the exception into a custom `Exception` type, we allow
a developer to flag the new exception type as something it can ignore,
without ignoring other relevant exceptions.
# API and ABI breaking changes
Not a breaking change.
Clients will need to regenerate bindings to get the new exceptions
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [X] Tested regenerating bindings and confirmed intended output.
- [X] Tested debugging and receiving
`SpacetimeDBEmptyReducerNameException` when expected.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Bumping versions to 1.6.0 in preparation for upcoming release.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [x] Existing CI only
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
* Small cleanups in `tools/check-diff.sh`
* Use `tools/check-diff.sh` wherever appropriate
* Simplify the `sdks/csharp/tools~/gen-*.sh` files after the repo merge
# API and ABI breaking changes
None.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [x] CI still passes
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
This is the implementation of issue #3191. This adds a Default attribute
to C# module fields.
**Note**: In C#, attribute arguments must be compile-time constants,
which means you can't directly use non-constant expressions like new
expressions, method calls, or dynamic values in attribute constructors.
(Ref:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/language-reference/language-specification/attributes#2324-attribute-parameter-types)
For this reason, these default values are limited to primitive types,
enums, and strings.
This includes (shown as `C# Type` (`BSATN type`):
* `bool` (`Bool`)
* `sbyte` (`I8`)
* `byte` (`U8`)
* `short` (`I16`)
* `ushort` (`U16`)
* `int` (`I32`)
* `unit` (`U32`)
* `long` (`I64`)
* `ulong` (`U64`)
* `float` (`F32`)
* `double` (`F64`)
* `enum` (`Enum`)
* `string` (`String`)
* `null` (`RefOption`) <- Nullable type
Because of C# limitations, for nullable and complex data types, such as
a struct, can take use `[Default(null)]` to populate values with null
defaults. This allows things like structs to workaround the non-constant
expressions in attribute constructors limitation by allowing these
complex types to still be able to be added as new column tables.
The `int` type can also be in the form of Hex or Binary literals, such
as `[Default(0x2A)]` or `[Default(0b00101010)]`
Both Decimal (like `[Default(3.14m)]`) and Char (like `[Default('A')]`)
are unsupported types in BSATN and will still return `BSATN0001` errors.
# API and ABI breaking changes
Not API breaking.
This change only adds the `[Default(value)]` attribute logic.
Using the `[Default(value)]` attribute with older versions SpacetimeDB
C# modules will result in an error.
# Expected complexity level and risk
2
# Testing
Local testing of this requires use of CLI changes in #3278
- [x] Regression test of functionality added.
# Description of Changes
I chose to regenerate all of the bindings in
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/pull/3310, but that caused
the snapshots to change. This PR follows up to update them.
I also updated the outdated script `tools~/gen-quickstart-chat.sh`
(which was generating from a different module than the CI was), and
updated the CI to use it instead of manually running a similar command.
# API and ABI breaking changes
Test-only changes.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [x] unity-testsuite passes on this PR (which it does not on `master`).
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Move the global.json file to the repo root, which should make `dotnet`
resolve the correct SDK regardless of the directory it is run in.
Where a copy of the global.json file is needed, symlink it to the one at
the root.
Should fix "C#/Unity - Test Suite".
# Description of Changes
Bumping remaining files so that everything is at 1.4.0.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
None
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Closes https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDBPrivate/issues/1987
# API and ABI breaking changes
This does not affect any APIs but it does affect the code generated
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [ ] Snap tests
# Description of Changes
To address user issue
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/issues/2647 , the C#
implementation of quickstart-chat files and documentation have been
updated to pattern match the variable assignment of User.
This has the benefit of the variables never being perceived by the
analyzers as a nullable types.
# API and ABI breaking changes
Not API breaking
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [X] Tested updated module code locally, following instructions from
the documentation.
Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Add a RemoteQuery regression test to C# SDK to address issue:
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/issues/3064
This adds on to existing regression tests, creating a rather small
change.
# API and ABI breaking changes
Not breaking change
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [X] Ran `dotnet test`, all tests pass
# Description of Changes
We recently merged several repos together. This PR clarifies the license
terms for several subdirectories, as well as the relationship between
the licenses.
The licenses in our subdirectories have become symbolic links to
licenses in our toplevel `licenses` directory. For any particular
subdirectory's license file in the diff, you can click `... -> View
file` and then click on the text that says "Symbolic Link" on that page.
This will take you to the license file that it links to.
I have also updated the `tools/upgrade-version` script to update the
change date in the new `licenses/BSL.txt` file.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
None. Only changes to license files.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Added a repo migration notice workflow to each repository that we've
merged into SpacetimeDB.
These need to be mirrored back to the actual repos with a process like:
```bash
git subtree split --prefix=sdks/typescript -b release/typescript
git push -f git@github.com:clockworklabs/spacetimedb-typescript-sdk.git release/typescript:main
git branch -D release/typescript
```
Once they're migrated there, the bot will automatically comment on any
PR or issue opened in those repos.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None. CI-only changes.
# Expected complexity level and risk
2
# Testing
- [x] In a demo repo, it properly commented and closed a PR:
https://github.com/clockworklabs/github-tooling-test/pull/42
- [x] In a demo repo, it properly commented and closed an issue:
https://github.com/clockworklabs/github-tooling-test/issues/43
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description of Changes
Moves table-specific operations out of `SpacetimeDBClient.cs` and into
`Table.cs` in order to reduce coupling between the two files.
This is the implementation of
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/issues/3047
This is a PR being duplicated/migrated from
https://github.com/clockworklabs/com.clockworklabs.spacetimedbsdk/pull/346,
which contains prior discussion/review/approval.
## API
- [ ] This is an API breaking change to the SDK
## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
No PRs needed, works with latest master
## Testsuite
SpacetimeDB branch name: master
## Testing
- [X] Opened and ran Blackhol.io within Unity Editor and successfully
connecting to a locally running server
- [X] Compiled a WebGL build of Blackhol.io and successfully connecting
to a locally running server
- [x] Opened and ran BitCraft within Unity Editor and successfully
connecting to a locally running server
# Description of Changes
I forgot to do this in the original version bump PR... I just ran
`dotnet pack` and then moved the meta files.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
None.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Bumped all versions to 1.3.0 in preparation for an upcoming minor
release.
# API and ABI breaking changes
No breaking changes.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
None
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
I ran `python3 tools~/upgrade-version.py 1.2.2` in preparation for an
upcoming release.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
None, just a version bump.
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
This is a fix for community bug which auth token is not used to create
Websocket connection in Unity WebGL build.
The issue here:
https://github.com/clockworklabs/com.clockworklabs.spacetimedbsdk/issues/352
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [ ] Using OAuth2.0 tokens, you should get the same `Identity` even
when the token is refreshed in the WebGL build
## Description of Changes
This is a fix for community bug
https://github.com/clockworklabs/com.clockworklabs.spacetimedbsdk/issues/340
that was the result of changes to SpacetimeDBClient code that missed
changes to the WebGL build.
## API
- [ ] This is an API breaking change to the SDK
## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
- None
## Testsuite
SpacetimeDB branch name: master
## Testing
- [X] Tested changes against Blackholio running under a Unity WebGL
build
## Description of Changes
These version bumps were supposed to happen in
https://github.com/clockworklabs/com.clockworklabs.spacetimedbsdk/pull/332,
but apparently I messed something up while I was switching branches.
## API
- [ ] This is an API breaking change to the SDK
No breaking changes
## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
None.
## Testsuite
SpacetimeDB branch name: master
## Testing
CI only
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Ryan