# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
- Bumps version to 2.2.0
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
- 1 - this is just a version bump
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [x] Version number is correct (`2.2.0`)
- [x] BSL license file has been updated with the new date and version
number
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <196249+bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Tests for case conversion.
# API and ABI breaking changes
NA
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
---------
Co-authored-by: clockwork-labs-bot <bot@clockworklabs.com>
Co-authored-by: clockwork-labs-bot <clockwork-labs-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Revert the following PRs that have caused some breakage:
```
a32cffa76 Finish refactoring out replay (#4850)
d639be0af Replay: some code motion & reuse `ReplayCommittedState` (#4849)
78d6b6f7d Update NativeAOT-LLVM infrastructure to current ABI (#4515)
d5c1738c1 Better module backtraces for panics and whatnot (#577)
6f23b19f3 Wait for database update to become durable (#4846)
81c9eab86 Add `spacetime lock/unlock` to prevent accidental database deletion (#4502)
809aebd7c Move field `replay_table_updated` to `ReplayCommittedState` (#4807)
21b58ef99 Update axum (#2713)
b5cadff7a Extract replay stuff out of `CommittedState`, part 1 (#4804)
```
I also updated the Python smoketests for breakage introduced in
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/pull/4502. Reverting that
PR caused conflicts, so this fix is more straightforward.
# API and ABI breaking changes
Maybe kind of, but we haven't released any of these.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
Ask @bfops about testing
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
~~Axum now has what we need out of it for a websocket wrapper, so we no
longer need to duplicate `util/flat_csv.rs` and `util/websocket.rs`,
meaning we have less code to maintain.~~ Nevermind, we know send raw
frames, which axum's wrapper does not support. Makes this PR simpler.
# Expected complexity level and risk
2 - upgrading a dependency is a risk, but looking through the
[changelog](https://github.com/tokio-rs/axum/blob/main/axum/CHANGELOG.md#080)
there isn't anything that should affect us.
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [x] tests pass <!-- maybe a test you want to do -->
- [ ] <!-- maybe a test you want a reviewer to do, so they can check it
off when they're satisfied. -->
Co-authored-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@users.noreply.github.com>
The previous approaches would either:
- panic when the queue becomes full, as `append_tx` is run inside the
context of a `LocalSet`, which is basically a glorified current thread
runtime
- deadlock because the receiver runtime has no way of notifiying the
sender of freed capacity in the channel
`async-channel` handles wait queues and notifications internally, so can
be used freely from either blocking or async contexts.
This _may_ come at different performance characteristics, but I haven't
measured them.
---------
Co-authored-by: joshua-spacetime <josh@clockworklabs.io>
# Description of Changes
We only benchmark the typescript module and sdk now.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
N/A
# Description of Changes
Bump versions to 2.1.0
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
CI
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
This patch removes the dead legacy SQL query engine and the remaining
code that only existed to support it.
Removed:
- Old SQL compiler/type-checker and VM-based execution path in
spacetimedb-core
- `spacetimedb-vm` crate
- Dead vm specific error variants and compatibility code
- Obsolete tests, benchmarks, and config paths that still referenced the
legacy engine
Small pieces still used by the current engine were moved to their proper
homes instead of keeping the `vm` crate around. In particular,
`RelValue` was moved to `spacetimedb-execution`.
The `sqltest` crate was also updated to use the current engine. Notably
though these tests are not run in CI, however I've kept them around as
they may be beneficial as we look to expand our SQL support in the
future.
Requires codeowner review from @cloutiertyler due to the removal of the
`LICENSE` file in the (now removed) `vm` crate.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
None
---------
Co-authored-by: clockwork-labs-bot <clockwork-labs-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Update pgwire to 0.37
Make `DataRowEncoder` reusable as enabled in this release, make
introduce 3x performance on encoding.
# API and ABI breaking changes
N/A
# Expected complexity level and risk
N/A
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [ ] <!-- maybe a test you want to do -->
- [ ] <!-- maybe a test you want a reviewer to do, so they can check it
off when they're satisfied. -->
---------
Signed-off-by: Ning Sun <sunning@greptime.com>
Signed-off-by: joshua-spacetime <josh@clockworklabs.io>
Co-authored-by: joshua-spacetime <josh@clockworklabs.io>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <196249+bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
- Bumps version to 2.0.5
# API and ABI breaking changes
None - this is just a version bump
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
# Expected complexity level and risk
1 - just a version bump
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [x] License file has been properly updated, including the date change
- [x] CI is passing other than the internal check
# Description of Changes
Upgrades the rust SDK's prometheus dependency from 0.13 to 0.14.
Fixes https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/issues/4597
# API and ABI breaking changes
[The prometheus
changelog](https://github.com/tikv/rust-prometheus/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#0140)
claims that the MSRV for the new version is 1.82, but this project
doesn't seem to have an official MSRV, so I don't think that's an ABI
change.
I don't think depending on a different prometheus version is itself a
breaking change. Prometheus is exposed through the rust SDK, but in an
explicitly [unstable
module](https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/blob/3f58b5951bf3c49971c51aecb526439597b9c044/sdks/rust/src/lib.rs#L69-L76)
which "may change incompatibly without a major version bump". Prometheus
structs are also exposed from several crates, but with the same
disclaimers about unstable interfaces.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1. This is a module bump with simple-looking changes.
# Testing
- [x] Just confirmed everything still compiles and the tests still pass
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <196249+bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Query builder views return a subset of rows from a physical table. If
that table has a primary key, then so should the view. What this means
concretely is that the view should expose the same api as the table,
specifically as it relates to the primary key column.
With that in mind, this patch commits the following changes:
1. Annotates `ViewDef` with a `primary_key`
2. Updates the return type of query builder views in the raw module def
to a special product type
3. Adds an index for the primary key on the view's backing table
4. Updates the query planner to use this index
5. Updates rust client codegen to generate `on_update` for such views
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
Old `impl Query` views compiled with an older version of SpacetimeDB
will continue to work as they did before - without a primary key.
# Expected complexity level and risk
3
# Testing
- [x] New rust sdk integration suite exercising `on_update` for PK views
and semijoin scenarios
- [x] Smoketests for PK views and semijoin scenarios
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
- Bumps version to 2.0.4
# API and ABI breaking changes
None - this is just a version bump
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
# Expected complexity level and risk
1 - this is just a version bump
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [x] License file has been updated with correct version + time
---------
Signed-off-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <196249+bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
- Version upgrade 2.0.3
# API and ABI breaking changes
- None, this is a version bump
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
# Expected complexity level and risk
- 1 - this is a version bump
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [x] License has been updated
- [x] Version number is correct (2.0.3)
# Description of Changes
Bumping all versions to 2.0.2 for the release.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
CI
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Just bumping versions to 2.0.1.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [ ] CI passes
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
- Fix `spacetime dev` failing on C# projects by watching the module
directory itself instead of hardcoded `spacetimedb_dir/src/` (which
doesn't exist for C# templates)
- Add layered file-watch filtering to avoid triggering rebuilds on build
artifacts:
1. Always-ignore dirs (`target/`, `bin/`, `obj/`, `node_modules/`, etc.)
2. Always-watch exceptions (`.env.local`, `spacetime.*.local.json`)
3. `.gitignore` rules from global, project, and module levels
- Suppress init's generic "Next steps" message when called from
`spacetime dev`, print a dev-appropriate `cd` hint instead when a new
project is created in a subdirectory
- Update 12 quickstart docs to tell users to open a new terminal and `cd
my-spacetime-app` before running CLI commands
## Test plan
- [x] `cargo build -p spacetimedb-cli` compiles successfully
- [ ] `spacetime dev --template basic-cs` no longer errors with "Input
watch path is neither a file nor a directory"
- [ ] Modifying a `.cs` file in `spacetimedb/` triggers a rebuild
- [ ] Build artifacts in `obj/`/`bin/` do not trigger rebuilds
- [ ] Rust projects (`spacetimedb/src/` exists) continue to work as
before
- [ ] `spacetime dev --template basic-cs` from a non-project directory
prints the "Tip: cd" hint, not the generic "Next steps"
- [ ] `spacetime init` standalone still prints "Next steps" as before
---------
Co-authored-by: clockwork-labs-bot <clockwork-labs-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
This fixes the confusing error encountered by @gefjon:
```
$ spacetime publish -s local --module-path spacetimedb --no-config event-table-test-ts
Rolldown warning: Could not resolve 'spacetimedb/server' in spacetimedb/src/index.ts
Error: Your module doesn't import the `spacetimedb/server` package at all - this is likely a mistake, as your module will not be able to interface with the SpacetimeDB host.
```
After:
```
[UNRESOLVED_IMPORT] Error: Could not resolve 'spacetimedb/server' in src/index.ts
╭─[ src/index.ts:1:47 ]
│
1 │ import { schema, table, t, SenderError } from 'spacetimedb/server';
│ ──────────┬─────────
│ ╰─────────── Module not found.
│
│ Help: You may have forgotten to install dependencies with your package manager.
───╯
```
And also runs `tsc`, so that modules with type errors aren't silently
published. Perhaps we want a `--skip-tsc` so that people can run anyway
and get runtime errors?
# Expected complexity level and risk
2
# Testing
- [x] Ensured that tsc and rolldown errors are properly emitted.
# Description of Changes
This PR implements support for the `spacetime.json` configuration file
that can be used to set up common `generate` and `publish` targets. An
example of `spacetime.json` could look like this:
```
{
"dev_run": "pnpm dev",
"generate": [
{ "out-dir": "./foobar", "module-path": "region-module", "language": "c-sharp" },
{ "out-dir": "./global", "module-path": "global-module", "language": "c-sharp" },
],
"publish": {
"database": "bitcraft",
"module-path": "spacetimedb",
"server": "local",
"children": [
{ "database": "region-1", "module-path": "region-module", server: "local" },
{ "database": "region-2", "module-path": "region-module", server: "local" }
]
}
}
```
With this config, running `spacetime generate` without any arguments
would generate bindings for two targets: `region-module` and
`global-module`. `spacetime publish` without any arguments would publish
three modules, starting from the parent: `bitcraft`, `region-1`, and
`region-2`. On top of that, the command `pnpm dev` would be executed
when using `spacetime dev`.
It is also possible to pass additional command line arguments when
calling the `publish` and `generate` commands, but there are certain
limitations. There is a special case when passing either a module path
to generate or a module name to publish. Doing that will filter out
entries in the config file that do not match. For example, running:
```
spacetime generate --project-path global-module
```
would only generate bindings for the second entry in the `generate`
list.
In a similar fashion, running:
```
spacetime publish region-1
```
would only publish the child database with the name `region-1`
Passing other existing arguments is also possible, but not all of the
arguments are available for multiple configs. For example, when running
`spacetime publish --server maincloud`, the publish command would be
applied to all of the modules listed in the config file, but the
`server` value from the command line arguments would take precedence.
Running with arguments like `--bin-path` would, however, would throw an
error as `--bin-path` makes sense only in a context of a specific
module, thus this wouldn't work: `spacetime publish --bin-path
spacetimedb/target/debug/bitcraft.wasm`. I will throw an error unless
there is only one entry to process, thus `spacetime publish --bin-path
spacetimedb/target/debug/bitcraft.wasm bitcraft` would work, as it
filters the publish targets to one entry.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
3
The config file in itself is not overly complex, but when coupled with
the CLI it is somewhat tricky to get right. There are also some changes
that I had to make to how clap arguments are validated - because the
values can now come from both the config file and the clap config, we
can't use some of the built-in validations like `required`, or at least
I haven't found a clean way to do so.
# Testing
I've added some automated tests, but more tests and manual testing is
coming.
---------
Signed-off-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: bradleyshep <148254416+bradleyshep@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: clockwork-labs-bot <clockwork-labs-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: = <cloutiertyler@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
- Version upgrade to 2.0.
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
# Expected complexity level and risk
1 - this is just a version bump
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [x] License file has been updated
- [x] CI passing
---------
Signed-off-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Rolldown likely [won't release 1.0 until after vite
8.0](https://voidzero.dev/posts/announcing-rolldown-rc), but I figure we
should keep up to date somewhat and switch from the beta to the rc.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [x] `spacetime build` with typescript modules still works.
---------
Signed-off-by: Noa <coolreader18@gmail.com>
# Description of Changes
Haven't changed `schema()` to accept an object yet, maybe that's for a
followup?
Now everything exported from the module must be exported from the
typescript module.
# Expected complexity level and risk
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [ ] <!-- maybe a test you want to do -->
- [ ] <!-- maybe a test you want a reviewer to do, so they can check it
off when they're satisfied. -->
# Description of Changes
Fixes#3926. This PR bundles in icudata (11MB) to the spacetime binary,
to allow i18n functions like `String.prototype.localeCompare()` to work.
The 2nd commit sets the default locale to [en-001, "International
English"](https://www.ctrl.blog/entry/en-001.html), in order to prevent
system locale from affecting the execution of reducers.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [x] Verify this fixes the issue.
# Description of Changes
Required in order to bump rolldown to its latest version, which I'm
planning to do afterwards. I also figure we may as well do this before
releasing a major version.
# Expected complexity level and risk
2
# Testing
n/a
# Description of Changes
This PR translates all of our Python smoketests into Rust tests which
can be run from `cargo run`
## Motivation
The purpose of this fivefold:
1. All developers on the team are familiar with Rust
2. It simplifies our devops because we can drop Python as a dependency
to run the tests
3. You can now run all tests in the repo through the single `cargo test`
interface
4. Because we use the `SpacetimeDbGuard` and `cargo test`/`cargo
nextest` we can easily parallelize the smoke tests
5. The smoketests can now use machinery imported from SpacetimeDB crates
(e.g. `bsatn` etc.)
IMPORTANT NOTE!
There are several ways to implement the smoke tests in Rust (none are
great):
1. A separate xtask specifically for the smoke tests
- This doesn't solve the problem of the CLI tests which also use the
`guard` crate
- Idiosyncratic way to run the smoke tests as opposed to cargo test
- Does NOT resolve the cargo within cargo problem because we still have
to build the test modules with cargo
2. A `build.rs` script in `guard` which first builds the executables as
a compile step for compiling guard
- Deadlocks on a cargo lock file conflict (Outer cargo compiles guard →
runs build.rs, inner cargo tries to acquire the build directory lock,
outer cargo holds the directory lock, deadlock)
- If you fix the deadlock by using different target dirs, it still looks
stuck on building guard because it's actually compiling all of
spacetimedb-standalone and spacetimedb-cli.
- Still technically runs cargo inside of cargo.
3. Add `spacetimedb-cli` and `spacetimedb-standalone` as an artifact
dependency of the guard crate
- Has good and clear output but requires +nightly when running the
smoketests and CLI tests, otherwise won't do the right thing. See
https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/9096
4. Compile the executables at runtime during the tests themselves where
the first test takes a lock while the executables are building using
cargo within cargo
- Makes the tests look like they're taking a long time when they're just
waiting for the build to complete
- Requires relatively complex locking machinery across
binaries/tests/processes
5. A two step solution where the developer has to build the binaries
before calling the smoke tests
- Very error prone
None of these are good. `xtask` is not bad, but doesn't enable us to run
other integration tests in other crates (e.g. the CLI)
(3) is the correct solution and has the best user experience, but it
requires nightly and I don't want to introduce that for all of our
tests.
I have chosen to do a combination of (1) and (4). You will now run the
smoketests with `cargo smoketest`. If you run `cargo test --all` (or use
`guard`) without doing `cargo smoketest` it will fall back to (4) which
compiles the executables at runtime. Running `cargo build` is the **only
way** to ensure that the executables are not stale because of the
internal fingerprint checking. Everything else is fragile not robust.
NOTE! There is no way to avoid cargo within cargo and have the smoke
tests be run as cargo tests because the modules under test must be
compiled with cargo.
# API and ABI breaking changes
Note that this is a BREAKING CHANGE to `cargo test --all`. The
smoketests are now part of `cargo test --all` unless you specifically
exclude them.
# Expected complexity level and risk
3, this is partially AI translated. We need to carefully review to
ensure the semantics have not regressed.
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [ ] <!-- maybe a test you want to do -->
- [ ] <!-- maybe a test you want a reviewer to do, so they can check it
off when they're satisfied. -->
---------
Signed-off-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Zeke Foppa <196249+bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <196249+bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
The goal of this PR is to:
- Make it easy to switch our backing implementation of identifiers, as
seen in the commit changing to `LeanString`.
- Improve type safety of our identifiers by having every identifier
start with `RawIdentifier` and then `Identifier` is just a wrapper with
validation on construction. `TableName` and `ReducerName` are then just
wrappers around `Identifier`.
- Reduce allocation in `InstanceEnv` by using the now clone-on-write
O(1) + SSO optimized `Identifier`.
- Reduce allocations in the query engine as a consequence of improving
`RawIdentifier` and `Identifier`.
- Have `&'static str` strings be further optimized by avoiding to
allocate even for long ones. This is supported by `impl From<&'static
str> for RawIdentifier` as well as switching to `LeanString`.
The PR results in a roughly 2k TPS improvement over master for WASM +
hash indices. This should also help V8, as this is VM-agnostic.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
3? Mostly just small changes in many places, but in a sea of small
changes, mistakes can happen.
# Testing
Covered by existing tests.
# Description of Changes
And more precisely pin the Cargo dep, along with a comment.
# API and ABI breaking changes
N/a
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [x] `nix build` now exits 0 and produces runnable binaries locally.
(`nix flake check` is still broken.)
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
Copied from: https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/pull/4084
We originally reverted this because it was causing testsuite flakes in
private. Now we have solved the issue that was causing the flakes so
this should be safe to merge.
Version upgrade to `v1.12.0`.
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1 - this is just a version upgrade
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
The testsuite failures are fixed by
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/pull/4120
- [x] License has been properly updated including version number and
date
- [x] CI passes
---------
Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: rekhoff <r.ekhoff@clockworklabs.io>
Co-authored-by: clockwork-labs-bot <clockwork-labs-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
This reverts the version bump, since it seems to be causing test
flakiness somehow.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
- [ ] CI passes
---------
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
The first commit defines a type `TableName` that is used in e.g.,
`TxData` and where determined profitable and necessary to do this
change.
`TableName` is backed by
[`ecow::EcoString`](https://docs.rs/ecow/0.2.6/ecow/string/struct.EcoString.html)
which affords O(1) clones and 15 bytes of inline storage and
`mem::size_of::<EcoString>() == 16`.
The second commit does the same for `ReducerName`. This is also used in
reducer execution.
Together, these commits increase TPS by around 5-7k TPS.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
Covered by existing tests.
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
Version upgrade to `v1.12.0`.
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1 - this is just a version upgrade
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
The testsuite failures are fixed by
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/pull/4120
- [x] License has been properly updated including version number and
date
- [x] CI passes
---------
Co-authored-by: rekhoff <r.ekhoff@clockworklabs.io>
Co-authored-by: clockwork-labs-bot <clockwork-labs-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
This PR renames the templates to always use shorthand for the language,
specify a framework (or console) if necessary, and shorten the naming in
general
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
# Testing
I've tested generating templates manually
---------
Co-authored-by: clockwork-labs-bot <clockwork-labs-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Client Query builder for rust, as per proposal -
https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDBPrivate/pull/2356.
1. Pach moves query builder to its separate crate, so that it can be
shared between module and sdk.
2. Implements `TypedSubscriptionBuilder` in `sdks/rust` as mentioned in
proposal
3. Modify codegen to extend types to support query builder as mentioned
in proposal
4. a test
# API and ABI breaking changes
NA, additive changes.
# Expected complexity level and risk
2
# Testing
Added a test.
---------
Signed-off-by: Shubham Mishra <shivam828787@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: joshua-spacetime <josh@clockworklabs.io>
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
- Small fix for checking to see if a port is available on some given
interface.
updated:
The original implementation here used `bind` to try to discover if a
port is currently in use. This isn't reliable due to platform
differences - especially on windows where it's apparently acceptable to
have a service running on both `0.0.0.0:3000` and `127.0.0.1:3000`. This
would cause bind to return successfully when we wanted it to fail. Also:
binding on an ipv6 interface when a machine doesn't have ipv6 enabled
caused random errors and it was too unreliable to be useful.
This new implementation uses `get_socket_info` which returns info on all
sockets in use on the system. We can then look through this list to find
services which conflict with our requested port.
updated 1/14:
This PR now includes a fix for flaky CLI tests. Originally we were using
`find_free_port` to pick a random free port, but that was causing a race
condition which resulted in test flakes. This PR fixes this issue by
using `127.0.0.1:0` as the listen addr so the kernel will automatically
pick a free port for us.
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
1 - this is a pretty isolated check, unlikely to introduce larger
issues.
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
I tested on macos, windows and linux:
```
ALLOW
docusaurus is already running on 127.0.0.1:3000
SpacetimeDB then tries to start on 192.168.1.10:3000
ALLOW
docusaurus is already running on ::1:3000
SpacetimeDB then tries to start on 192.168.1.10:3000
DENY
docusaurus is already running on ::1:3000
SpacetimeDB then tries to start on 127.0.0.1:3000
DENY
docusaurus is already running on 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:3000
SpacetimeDB then tries to start on 0.0.0.0:3000
DENY
docusaurus is already running on 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:3000
SpacetimeDB then tries to start on 127.0.0.1:3000
DENY
docusaurus is already running on 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:3000
SpacetimeDB then tries to start on 192.168.1.10:3000
DENY
docusaurus is already running on 127.0.0.1:3000
SpacetimeDB then tries to start on 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:3000
DENY
docusaurus is already running on 192.168.1.10:3000
SpacetimeDB then tries to start on 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:3000
```
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
- Version bump to `v1.11.3` for just the CLI and rust
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [x] CLI version has been updated
- [x] Version + date in the license file has been updated
# Description of Changes
We would like to move all of the templates to a central directory
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
2
# Testing
---------
Co-authored-by: spacetimedb-bot <spacetimedb-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
- Version upgrade to `1.11.2`
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
- None, this is just a version bump
# Expected complexity level and risk
1 - no real changes here
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
- NA this is just a version bump, no functionality change here.
# Description of Changes
Introduce a new **LLM benchmarking app** and supporting code.
* **CLI:** `llm` with subcommands `run`, `routes list`, `diff`,
`ci-check`.
* **Runner:** executes globally numbered tasks; filters by `--lang`,
`--categories`, `--tasks`, `--providers`, `--models`.
* **Providers/clients:** route layer (`provider:model`) with HTTP LLM
Vendor clients; env-driven keys/base URLs.
* **Evaluation:** deterministic scorers (hash/equality, JSON
shape/count, light schema/reducer parity) with clear failure messages.
* **Results:** stable JSON schema; single-file HTML viewer to
inspect/filter/export CSV.
* **Build & guards:** build script for compile-time setup;
* **Docs:** `DEVELOP.md` includes `cargo llm …` usage.
This PR is the initial addition of the app and its modules (runner,
config, routes, prompt/segmentation, scorers, schema/types,
defaults/constants/paths/hashing/combine, publishers, spacetime guard,
HTML stats viewer).
### How it works
1. **Pick what to run**
* Choose tasks (`--tasks 0,7,12`), or a language (`--lang rust|csharp`),
or categories (`--categories basics,schema`).
* Optionally limit vendors/models (`--providers …`, `--models …`).
2. **Resolve routes**
* Read env (API keys + base URLs) and build the active set (e.g.,
`openai:gpt-5`).
3. **Build context**
* Start Spacetime
* Publish golden answer modules
* Prepare prompts and send to LLM model
* Attempt to publish LLM module
4. **Execute calls**
* Run the selected tasks within each test against selected models and
languages.
5. **Score outputs**
* Apply deterministic scorers (hash/equality, JSON shape/count, simple
schema/reducer checks).
* Record the score and any short failure reason.
6. **Update results file**
* Write/update the single results JSON with task/route outcomes,
timings, and summaries.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None. New application and modules; no existing public APIs/ABIs altered.
# Expected complexity level and risk
**4/5.** New CLI, routing, evaluation, and artifact format.
* External model APIs may rate-limit/timeout; concurrency tunable via
`LLM_BENCH_CONCURRENCY` / `LLM_BENCH_ROUTE_CONCURRENCY`.
# Testing
I ran the full test matrix and generated results for every task against
every vendor, model, and language (rust + C#). I also tested the CI
check locally using [act](https://github.com/nektos/act).
**Please verify**
* [ ] `llm run --tasks 0,1,2` (explicit `run`)
* [ ] `llm run --lang rust --categories basics` (filters)
* [ ] `llm run --categories basics,schema` (multiple categories)
* [ ] `llm run --lang csharp` (language switch)
* [ ] `llm run --providers openai,anthropic --models "openai:gpt-5
anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-5"` (provider/model limits)
* [ ] `llm run --hash-only` (dry integrity)
* [ ] `llm run --goldens-only` (test goldens only)
* [ ] `llm run --force` (skip hash check)
* [ ] `llm ci-check`
* [ ] Stats viewer loads the JSON; filtering and CSV export work
* [ ] CI works as intended
---------
Signed-off-by: bradleyshep <148254416+bradleyshep@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@aol.com>
Co-authored-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: spacetimedb-bot <spacetimedb-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Closes
[#3290](https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/issues/3290).
Adds a new "special" type to SATS, `UUID`, which is represented as the
product `{ __uuid__: u128 }`. Adds versions of this type to all of our
various languages' module bindings libraries and client SDKs, and
updates codegen to recognize it and output references to those named
library types. Adds methods for creating new UUIDs according to the V4
(all random) and V7 (timestamp, monotonic counter and random)
specifications.
# API and ABI breaking changes
We add a new type
# Expected complexity level and risk
2
it impacts all over the code
# Testing
- [x] Extends the Rust and Unreal SDK tests, and the associated
`module-test` modules in Rust, C# and TypeScript, with uses of UUIDs.
- [x] Extends the C# SDK regression tests with uses of UUIDs.
- [x] Extends the TypeScript test suite with tests with uses of UUIDs.
---------
Signed-off-by: Mario Montoya <mamcx@elmalabarista.com>
Co-authored-by: Phoebe Goldman <phoebe@clockworklabs.io>
Co-authored-by: Jason Larabie <jason@clockworklabs.io>
Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
This reverts unnecessary changes to whitespace to prevent conflicts in
old PRs.
If you hide whitespace, you can confirm that this commit is a no-op.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
0
# Description of Changes
<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->
- Bump version numbers to `1.11.1`
# API and ABI breaking changes
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
1
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
- [x] Verified that the license has been updated
- [x] `spacetime --version` on this commit is correct
There is also a corresponding private PR.
# Description of Changes
Uses `with_host_stack` to provide a `StackCreator` that pools
`FiberStack`s.
This does not use the pooling instance allocator and is limited to just
stacks.
# API and ABI breaking changes
None
# Expected complexity level and risk
3? Some unsafe and wasmtime internals relied upon.
# Testing
Covered by existing tests.
# Description of Changes
This changes the ci runs to execute `cargo ci` instead of running
commands directly from the github workflow.
The goal here is to unify the commands under `cargo ci` so that it's
easier and more intuitive to run locally
# API and ABI breaking changes
There are no API/ABI changes.
<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->
# Expected complexity level and risk
Complexity: 1
It is not a complex change as it is mostly localized to the ci runs and
is easily reversible if something goes wrong. The biggest risk here is
to have future CI runs break, which can be remediated by reverting these
changes.
<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.
This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.
If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->
# Testing
<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->
- [x] run `cargo ci` and its subcommands locally
- [x] run the github workflow against this branch to check if the CI
jobs are working properly.
---------
Signed-off-by: Zeke Foppa <196249+bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Roberto Pommella Alegro <robertoaall@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <196249+bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description of Changes
Uses the `sourcemap` crate to map text locations in the bundle to text
locations in the original source code.
# Expected complexity level and risk
1 - essentially only related to diagnostics
# Testing
- [x] Manually tested
- [ ] Add an automated test for backtrace output
# Description of Changes
As discussed; could possibly improve performance/in general it's good to
keep up with patches, it's been over a year since we last bumped this.
# Expected complexity level and risk
2 - large, important dependency but wasmtime is very solid,
well-engineered software.
# Testing
- [x] smoketests run on wasmtime
John Detter