Remove untrue part of `__import__` replacement docs
The original statement effectively says that replacing `__import__` at global scope affects import statements, and not only that, but only import statements within the rest of the executing module. None of that has been true since at least Python 2.7, I think.
This was likely missed in python/cpython#69686.
Much of the information was duplicated in stdtypes.rst; this PR keeps lexical/syntactical details in Lexical Analysis and the evaluation & runtime behaviour in Standard types, with cross-references between the two.
Since the t-string section only listed differences from f-strings, and the grammar for the two is equivalent, that section was moved to Standard types almost entirely.
Co-authored-by: Blaise Pabon <blaise@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Stan Ulbrych <89152624+StanFromIreland@users.noreply.github.com>
This simplifies the Lexical Analysis section on Names (but keeps it technically correct) by putting all the info about non-ASCII characters in a separate (and very technical) section.
It uses a mental model where the parser doesn't handle Unicode complexity “immediately”, but:
- parses any non-ASCII character (outside strings/comments) as part of a name, since these can't (yet) be e.g. operators
- normalizes the name
- validates the name, using the xid_start/xid_continue sets
Co-authored-by: Stan Ulbrych <89152624+StanFromIreland@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Blaise Pabon <blaise@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Micha Albert <info@micha.zone>
Co-authored-by: KeithTheEE <kmurrayis@gmail.com>
The documentation incorrectly stated that generator.close() 'raises' a
GeneratorExit exception. This was misleading because the method doesn't
raise the exception to the caller - it sends the exception internally
to the generator and returns None.
* gh-135171: Update documentation for the generator expression
Document that the iterator for the leftmost "for" clause is created
immediately.
* Update Doc/reference/expressions.rst
Co-authored-by: Brian Skinn <brian.skinn@gmail.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Brian Skinn <brian.skinn@gmail.com>
Prepare the docs for using the notation used in the `python.gram`
file. If we want to sync the two, the meta-syntax should be the same.
Link the Full Grammar docs here; keep only a few extras.
Also, remove the distinction between lexical and syntactic rules,
except for whitespace handling.
With f- and t-strings, the line between the two is blurry.
Co-authored-by: Blaise Pabon <blaise@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lysandros Nikolaou <lisandrosnik@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Colin Marquardt <cmarqu42@gmail.com>
* Add t-string prefixes to _all_string_prefixes, and add a test to make sure we catch this error in the future.
* Update lexical analysis docs for t-string prefixes.
- Mention (again) that `type.__annotations__` is unsafe. It is now safe
when using only classes defined under PEP 649 semantics, but not with
classes defined using `from __future__ import annotations`.
- Mention that annotations on instances no longer work. There was already
an issue about this.
- Mention the general changes in the "Porting to Python 3.14" section.
- `annotationlib` was proposed by PEP-749, not PEP-649.
Co-authored-by: Emma Smith <emma@emmatyping.dev>
Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <carolcode@willingconsulting.com>
Serhiy Storchaka