Files
Copilot 45b4fffae4 refactor: use named Permission field in Repository struct instead of anonymous embedding (#37441)
The `Repository` struct in `services/context/repo.go` embedded
`access_model.Permission` anonymously, causing all permission methods to
be promoted directly onto `Repository`. This made it unclear at call
sites whether a method belonged to `Repository` itself or to its
embedded `Permission`.

### Changes

- **`services/context/repo.go`**: Replace anonymous
`access_model.Permission` with named field `Permission
access_model.Permission`
- **49 files** updated to route permission method calls through the
named field:

```go
// Before
ctx.Repo.IsAdmin()
ctx.Repo.CanWrite(unit.TypeCode)
ctx.Repo.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull)
slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.CanWrite)

// After
ctx.Repo.Permission.IsAdmin()
ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite(unit.TypeCode)
ctx.Repo.Permission.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull)
slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite)
```

Methods defined directly on `*Repository` (`CanWriteToBranch`,
`CanCreateBranch`, etc.) are unchanged.

---------

Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <2114189+wxiaoguang@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
2026-04-26 20:18:28 +00:00

96 lines
2.4 KiB
Go

// Copyright 2018 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package context
import (
"net/http"
"slices"
auth_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/auth"
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unit"
)
// RequireRepoAdmin returns a middleware for requiring repository admin permission
func RequireRepoAdmin() func(ctx *Context) {
return func(ctx *Context) {
if !ctx.IsSigned || !ctx.Repo.Permission.IsAdmin() {
ctx.NotFound(nil)
return
}
}
}
// CanWriteToBranch checks if the user is allowed to write to the branch of the repo
func CanWriteToBranch() func(ctx *Context) {
return func(ctx *Context) {
if !ctx.Repo.CanWriteToBranch(ctx, ctx.Doer, ctx.Repo.BranchName) {
ctx.NotFound(nil)
return
}
}
}
// RequireUnitWriter returns a middleware for requiring repository write to one of the unit permission
func RequireUnitWriter(unitTypes ...unit.Type) func(ctx *Context) {
return func(ctx *Context) {
if slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite) {
return
}
ctx.NotFound(nil)
}
}
// RequireUnitReader returns a middleware for requiring repository write to one of the unit permission
func RequireUnitReader(unitTypes ...unit.Type) func(ctx *Context) {
return func(ctx *Context) {
for _, unitType := range unitTypes {
if ctx.Repo.Permission.CanRead(unitType) {
return
}
if unitType == unit.TypeCode && canWriteAsMaintainer(ctx) {
return
}
}
ctx.NotFound(nil)
}
}
// CheckRepoScopedToken check whether personal access token has repo scope
func CheckRepoScopedToken(ctx *Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, level auth_model.AccessTokenScopeLevel) {
if !ctx.IsBasicAuth || ctx.Data["IsApiToken"] != true {
return
}
scope, ok := ctx.Data["ApiTokenScope"].(auth_model.AccessTokenScope)
if ok { // it's a personal access token but not oauth2 token
var scopeMatched bool
requiredScopes := auth_model.GetRequiredScopes(level, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryRepository)
// check if scope only applies to public resources
publicOnly, err := scope.PublicOnly()
if err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("HasScope", err)
return
}
if publicOnly && repo.IsPrivate {
ctx.HTTPError(http.StatusForbidden)
return
}
scopeMatched, err = scope.HasScope(requiredScopes...)
if err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("HasScope", err)
return
}
if !scopeMatched {
ctx.HTTPError(http.StatusForbidden)
return
}
}
}