mirror of
https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy.git
synced 2026-05-13 12:17:28 -04:00
de529fb81c
even if they are *not* restated. its necessary here to do a "replacement" scheme when an incoming sequence replaces the previous. Theoretically we could do what Table does here, i.e. use a singleton constructor, but this is heavyhanded. The most recent sequence placed in is the winner is likely the most expected behavior.